How does the evidence presented in a small claims court hearing differ from that presented in other courts?

In general, the evidence presented in a small claims court hearing in Wisconsin differs from that presented in other courts in terms of complexity and formality. Small claims court is a less formal, less complicated court process than other court proceedings. The types of evidence accepted in small claims court are basic and don’t include expert witness testimony or complex legal research. This type of court relies heavily on witness testimony to provide evidence to support the case. In terms of formality, in a small claims court hearing, rules of evidence and decorum are relaxed compared to other courts. Certain things don’t need to be presented or proven as they would in other courts. It is less formal because it is intended to be a quick and efficient way of resolving disputes without both parties going through the extensive process of a regular court trial. In addition, parties to a small claims court case may submit documents, such as contracts, photos, or other appropriate evidence to support their case. Witnesses may also be called to testify at the hearing. Each party is usually able to present their version of the facts and the court is usually allowed to make a judgment or award damages on the basis of the facts presented. In conclusion, small claims court hearings are much less formal than those in other courts, but they still require the parties to present evidence to support their case. This evidence typically includes witness testimony, documents, and photos. The court is then able to make a judgment or award damages based on the evidence presented.

How does the evidence presented in a small claims court hearing differ from that presented in other courts?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts