What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

A motion for judgment in small claims court is a request made by the plaintiff (the person who initiated the lawsuit) that the judge render a judgment in their favor without the need for a trial. This can also be referred to as a motion for summary judgment. The motion is based on the facts that have been presented and the plaintiff’s belief that the defendant (the person being sued) has no valid defense. A motion for new trial in small claims court is a request made by either the plaintiff or the defendant to the judge for a new trial or a re-hearing on the merits of the case. This motion is made when neither party is satisfied with the judge’s ruling. The motion can be based on the grounds that the court’s ruling was based on incomplete or inaccurate information or on new evidence that has been discovered since the original trial. The judge can either deny the motion or order a new trial.

Related FAQs

What happens if a judgment is not paid in small claims court?
How do I file a motion in small claims court?
What is the procedure for submitting evidence to the court in a small claims case?
How do I request a stay of proceedings in small claims court?
Are there any restrictions on the type of evidence I can submit in a small claims court case?
Can I get an extension on my small claims court case?
What is the difference between mediation and arbitration in small claims court?
What kind of assistance is available to help me prepare for small claims court?
How do I go about representing myself in small claims court?
Can I introduce new evidence in a small claims court hearing after it has started?

What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts