What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

In small claims court in Texas, a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial are two distinct legal proceedings. A motion for judgment is a request by a party in the case to have the court render a decision in their favor. The request must include a legal basis for the decision, such as the other party not having provided sufficient evidence or not complying with a court order. The judge will then decide whether to grant the motion for judgment and close the case. A motion for new trial is a request by a party to have the case re-tried with new evidence, witnesses, or arguments. This motion must include a legal basis for why the first trial was unfair or incomplete. The judge will then decide whether to grant the motion and re-try the case. In summary, a motion for judgment is a request for a decision in favor of the requesting party based on legal grounds, while a motion for new trial is a request for a re-trial of the case based on legal grounds indicating the first trial was incomplete.

Related FAQs

What is the process for requesting a court trial in a small claims court case?
Can I appeal a ruling of a small claims court judge?
Is there a limit on the amount of money I can collect in a small claims court case?
Is there a deadline for filing a claim in small claims court?
How do I write an answer to a summons in a small claims court case?
How do I file a claim in small claims court?
Are there alternate dispute resolution options available in small claims court?
Is there a limit on the amount of damages that can be recovered in a small claims court case?
Can I introduce new evidence in a small claims court hearing after it has started?
How can I enforce a small claims court judgment out-of-state?

What is the difference between a motion for judgment and a motion for new trial in small claims court?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts