Are there any defenses against a slip and fall lawsuit?

Yes, there are several defenses against a slip and fall lawsuit in Massachusetts. Since slip and fall cases involve negligence, a defendant may be able to use a few different strategies to prove that they are not legally responsible. The first and most common defense used in slip and fall cases is to argue that the plaintiff was comparatively negligent. This means that the plaintiff contributed to their own injuries by not exercising reasonable care when they were in or around the hazardous area. For instance, a defendant may argue that a plaintiff should have seen a spill on the floor and avoided it. Another defense a defendant might use is to prove that there was an open and obvious danger that the plaintiff should have noticed. This means that the hazard was visible and apparent, and the plaintiff should have been aware of it. For example, if a slippery substance was spilled on a brightly-lit floor, the plaintiff should have seen it. The last defense is known as the assumption of risk. This defense is used when a plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risks associated with a hazardous activity. For example, if a plaintiff was walking on a wet floor without wearing appropriate footwear, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff assumed the risks associated with this activity by not taking the necessary precautions. Overall, there are several defenses that a defendant may use to combat a slip and fall lawsuit in Massachusetts. To successfully prove their case, defendants will need to demonstrate that the plaintiff was comparatively negligent, the hazard was open and obvious, or the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risks associated with the activity.

Are there any defenses against a slip and fall lawsuit?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts