What is the difference between a “non-contact” and a “contact” sport?

The main difference between a non-contact and a contact sport is the level of physical contact between players. Non-contact sports involve little to no direct physical contact between players and are typically organized sports where the primary purpose is to outscore the opponents without any physical contact between athletes. Examples of non-contact sports include soccer, volleyball, golf, tennis, and baseball. In contrast, contact sports involve substantial physical contact between players as part of the game. Players can use their bodies to gain control of the ball, body check their opponent to gain advantage, and use physical force to protect their goal. Examples of contact sports include ice hockey, basketball, football, rugby, and lacrosse. In Washington, sports injuries can be the basis for a claim for damages. Depending the severity, a person may be able to bring a claim for both medical expenses and for pain and suffering. Injured athletes may be able to file a claim for negligence against the person or organization who caused the injury. When it comes to sporting injuries, courts may be more sympathetic in contact sports where the level of physical contact is expected, while they are more likely to be dismissive of claims arising from non-contact sports.

Related FAQs

What is the “economic loss doctrine” in sports injury cases?
What is the “notice of claim” in a sports injury case?
What are the legal defenses to a sports injury claim?
What is “negligence per se?”
What is the “Heightened Duty of Care” in a sports injury lawsuit?
What is the role of “mediation” in sports injury cases?
What damages can be awarded in a sports injury case?
What is the “Discovery Rule” in a sports injury case?
What is a “release of liability?”
What is a “sports participant waiver” and when is it used in a sports injury case?

What is the difference between a “non-contact” and a “contact” sport?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts