What is the difference between a “contract” sports injury case and a “tort” sports injury case?

The difference between a “contract” sports injury case and a “tort” sports injury case in Mississippi is largely based on the negligence of the other party. In a “contract” sports injury case, the injured party will typically have to prove that there was a legally-binding contract between them and the other party, and that the other party did not fulfill their contractual obligations. For example, in cases involving sports equipment, the injured party will have to show that the equipment was defective, and that the other party was legally obligated to provide safe and functioning equipment. In a “tort” sports injury case, the injured party will typically have to prove that the other party acted negligently, recklessly, or intentionally. For example, if a sports coach or instructor is responsible for the injury of a player, that player may be able to bring a “tort” sports injury case against the coach or instructor if they can prove that the coach or instructor didn’t act in the player’s best interest, or acted in such a way that put the player at an unnecessarily high risk of injury. It is important to keep in mind that the specifics of each sports injury case will vary depending on the facts of the case. In either a “contract” or “tort” case, the injured party may be entitled to compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. The best way to ensure that you are fully protected and receive the appropriate compensation is to consult with an experienced Mississippi sports injury lawyer.

What is the difference between a “contract” sports injury case and a “tort” sports injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts