What is the “super-sport” doctrine in a sports injury case?

The “Super-sport” doctrine is a legal concept used in sports injury cases in California. It was established in the case Merrell v. Irvington Little League, and refers to the heightened level of risk that is assumed when participating in certain high-risk, high-contact sports. Essentially, the doctrine states that participants in certain sports implicitly understand and accept that they may be more likely to suffer serious injury when playing these sports. As such, the doctrine limits the amount of compensation that participants in the sport may be eligible for if they suffer an injury that is related to the sport’s higher level of risk. For example, if a participant in a high-contact sport such as American Football were to suffer a neck injury due to a tackling maneuver, they may be limited in the amount of compensation they are eligible to receive by the “Super-sport” doctrine. The doctrine holds that because the risk of neck injuries is an accepted part of American Football, the participant may not be eligible to receive full compensation for the injury. Ultimately, the “Super-sport” doctrine is an important legal concept that governs sports injury cases in California. It ensures that participants in high-risk sports understand and accept the risks associated with playing them, and limits the amount of compensation they may be eligible to receive if they suffer a sports-related injury.

Related FAQs

What is the “principle of reasonable care” in sports injury cases?
What are the common defenses raised in sports injury cases?
What is the “Discovery Rule” in a sports injury case?
What are the “Negligence Per Se” and “Gross Negligence” standards in sports injury cases?
What are the different legal theories utilized in sports injury litigation?
What are the legal defenses to a sports injury claim?
What are the differences between a “negligent” and an “intentional” injury in a sports injury case?
How is fault determined in a sports injury case?
What is the “duty of care” in sports related negligence cases?
What is the “statute of repose” in sports injury cases?

What is the “super-sport” doctrine in a sports injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts