What types of remedies are available in a false advertising claim?

In California, there are a variety of remedies available to those who have been the victim of false advertising. These remedies are outlined in the state’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). The most common type of remedy is the issuance of an injunction. An injunction is a court order that orders a particular person or business to cease from committing any further acts of false advertising. This prevents future false advertising from taking place, mitigating the harm caused to consumers. Another remedy available to consumers under the UCL is monetary damages. Consumers who have been the victim of false advertising can seek damages to compensate for the losses they have suffered due to the false advertisement. Finally, the UCL also allows for the recovery of attorney’s fees and costs. This allows those who have been the victim of false advertising to recover the costs associated with bringing their lawsuit and thus incentivizes the pursuit of justice. The remedies available under the UCL are broad and varied, allowing those who have been harmed due to false advertising to seek damages, costs and an injunction to stop the false advertising from continuing to take place.

Related FAQs

What is false advertising?
Are there any special rules for unfair competition in certain industries?
What is the purpose of the Lanham Act?
What is the difference between unfair competition and antitrust law?
Are there any international laws governing unfair competition?
Are there any remedies available for a violation of the antitrust laws?
How is trademark infringement different from unfair competition?
What does the Lanham Act prohibit?
What is the purpose of the Communications Decency Act?
What is the scope of the Lanham Act’s false designation of origin claim?

What types of remedies are available in a false advertising claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts