How has the Supreme Court interpreted the Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution?

The Ninth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” This amendment is often referred to as the “Rights Retained by the People” amendment. The Supreme Court has interpreted the Ninth Amendment in various ways over time. In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court found that the Ninth Amendment protected the right to marital privacy. The ruling in this case determined that states could not deny married couples access to birth control. This decision relied on the Ninth Amendment as a source of implied rights for people. The Supreme Court has also applied the Ninth Amendment in cases involving the rights of citizens to due process. In Roe v. Wade (1973), the Court found that the Ninth Amendment protected the right to privacy, which included a right to terminate pregnancy. The Court declared that this right was implicit in the enumerated right to privacy. In addition, the Supreme Court has used the Ninth Amendment to protect the right of individuals to possess firearms for self-defense. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Court found that the individual right to possess firearms was implicit in the enumerated rights to the Second Amendment. Although the Ninth Amendment does not explicitly provide for any particular right, the Supreme Court has interpreted it as a source of implicit rights for the people. The Supreme Court has used the Ninth Amendment to protect a variety of rights, including the right to marital privacy, the right to due process, and the right to possess firearms.

How has the Supreme Court interpreted the Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts