What is the difference between self-defense and justifiable homicide?

The difference between self-defense and justifiable homicide is an important one to understand under violent crimes law in New Mexico. Self-defense is when an individual uses reasonable force as a response to an imminent danger. The individual must be able to prove that they were in ‘imminent danger’ and had to use force to protect themselves. Justifiable homicide, on the other hand, is when an individual is allowed to use deadly force in self-defense if it is deemed necessary. In order for deadly force to be justified, the individual must be able to prove that their life was in danger. In both cases, the individual must demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that they were in a situation where they had to defend themselves in order for their actions to be considered either self-defense or justifiable homicide. However, where self-defense is allowed when the danger posed is imminent, justifiable homicide only applies when the individual can justify that their life was in danger. This will usually require proof that the act of deadly force was the only possible option in order to prevent death or serious bodily harm.

Related FAQs

What are some of the possible consequences of a violent crime conviction?
What is the difference between a plea agreement and probation?
What is the difference between first and second degree murder?
What is the difference between manslaughter and murder?
What is the legal definition of a “dangerous weapon”?
What are the legal consequences of a conviction for a violent crime?
Are there any international laws that address violent crime?
What is the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony?
What is capital punishment?
What types of experts might be called to testify in a violent crime case?

What is the difference between self-defense and justifiable homicide?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts