What is the difference between a civil and a criminal charge of fraud?

In Tennessee, the difference between a civil and a criminal charge of fraud is significant. In a civil case of fraud, the goal is to recover damages caused by the fraudulent act. This means that the person filing the lawsuit is seeking financial compensation for the loss. Generally, civil cases of fraud require the plaintiff to prove that there was an intentional act of fraud and to show evidence of how the fraudulent act caused the damage. In a criminal case of fraud, the goal is to punish the person responsible for the fraudulent act. This means that the person being charged with a criminal offense is being accused of a crime. Criminal charges of fraud typically require the prosecution to show that the accused committed an intentional act of fraud that caused a financial loss. Additionally, the prosecution will also need to prove that the accused had the intent to commit the fraud. In both civil and criminal cases of fraud, the person filing the case must be able to show that the accused had knowledge of the wrongfulness of the act. The key difference is that in a civil case, the person filing the lawsuit is seeking a monetary award, whereas in a criminal case, the person being charged with fraud is facing potential criminal penalties.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between white collar crime and other types of criminal offenses?
What are the defenses to white collar crime?
What is money laundering?
How is a civil lawsuit related to a white collar crime?
What is the difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance?
How does the statute of limitations apply to white collar crimes?
How is mail fraud committed?
What is the difference between a white collar crime and a banking crime?
What are the penalties for corruption of public office?
How is restitution used in white collar crime cases?

What is the difference between a civil and a criminal charge of fraud?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts