What is the difference between a civil and a criminal charge of fraud?

In Texas, the difference between a civil and a criminal charge of fraud is that the main goal of each charge is different. A civil charge of fraud is typically brought by an individual or entity (such as a business). The goal of a civil charge is typically to receive damages or compensation for being the victim of fraud. It is not necessarily focused on punishing the person who committed the fraud. A criminal charge of fraud is typically brought by the government against an individual or business. The goal of a criminal charge is to punish the person or entity for their alleged fraud. Depending on the severity of the fraud, punishments can include fines, prison, and/or other consequences. In addition, the burden of proof differs between civil and criminal charges. For a civil charge, there is a lower burden of proof and the plaintiff (or person bringing the charge) must only show that it is more likely than not that the defendant committed the fraud. For a criminal charge, the burden of proof is higher and the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the fraud.

Related FAQs

What are the federal sentencing guidelines for white collar crimes?
What is the difference between bribery and extortion?
What is the difference between white collar crime and other types of criminal offenses?
What is the difference between a federal and a state white collar crime?
How is organized crime related to white collar crime?
How can a defense attorney help a person who is charged with a white collar crime?
How is cybercrime committed?
What is securities fraud?
How is money laundering prosecution used to fight white collar crime?
How is money laundering prosecuted?

What is the difference between a civil and a criminal charge of fraud?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts