What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

A trial and an arbitration are two ways people can resolve disputes when it comes to accident law in Texas. In a trial, the two parties involved go up against each other with court proceedings and a judge or jury decides the outcome. In an arbitration, the parties attend a hearing where they present evidence to a neutral third-party who makes the decision. The main difference between the two is that a trial is a public process, while an arbitration is usually private. A trial is based on law, so the judge or jury must abide by the legal guidelines and only take evidence into consideration if it is relevant. An arbitration, on the other hand, is based on fairness and the arbitrator can consider evidence that may not be admissible in court. In a trial, the outcome is legally binding and can be enforced in court. An arbitration, while it can be legally binding, is not as enforceable as a trial and can be appealed in court if necessary. Moreover, a trial is often longer and more costly than an arbitration, as it involves more government process and procedures. Overall, a trial and an arbitration are two very different approaches to accident law in Texas and it is important to understand the differences between them before opting for one or the other.

Related FAQs

What is a settlement offer?
What steps should I take if I'm injured in an accident?
What should I do if I am in an accident with an uninsured driver?
How much do personal injury lawyers charge?
What is a release of all claims?
What is a liability waiver?
What types of damages are available in a personal injury claim?
How long does it take to settle a personal injury case?
How can I prove the other party's negligence in a personal injury claim?
How is pain and suffering calculated in a personal injury claim?

What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts