What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

A trial and an arbitration are two ways people can resolve disputes when it comes to accident law in Texas. In a trial, the two parties involved go up against each other with court proceedings and a judge or jury decides the outcome. In an arbitration, the parties attend a hearing where they present evidence to a neutral third-party who makes the decision. The main difference between the two is that a trial is a public process, while an arbitration is usually private. A trial is based on law, so the judge or jury must abide by the legal guidelines and only take evidence into consideration if it is relevant. An arbitration, on the other hand, is based on fairness and the arbitrator can consider evidence that may not be admissible in court. In a trial, the outcome is legally binding and can be enforced in court. An arbitration, while it can be legally binding, is not as enforceable as a trial and can be appealed in court if necessary. Moreover, a trial is often longer and more costly than an arbitration, as it involves more government process and procedures. Overall, a trial and an arbitration are two very different approaches to accident law in Texas and it is important to understand the differences between them before opting for one or the other.

Related FAQs

Can I still make a claim if I was partially at fault for an accident?
What is a deposition?
What is a settlement agreement?
How long does it take to settle a personal injury case?
What is a settlement demand letter?
What is an employer’s liability in a personal injury case?
What is the Difference between Negligence and Intentional Torts?
What is the difference between a lawsuit and an insurance claim?
What should I do if I have been injured on someone else’s property?
What is a statute of limitations?

What are the differences between a trial and an arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts