What are judicial review and the doctrine of precedent in administrative law?

Judicial review and the doctrine of precedent are two important concepts in administrative law in Washington. Judicial review is the ability of a court to review the decisions of an administrative agency. This gives courts the power to declare an administrative action invalid if it is contrary to laws or the constitution. The doctrine of precedent is based on the concept of stare decisis, which means that decisions of higher courts become binding on lower courts. This includes decisions of the Supreme Court being binding on inferior courts in Washington. In essence, this means that decisions that affect a similar case should be treated the same under the law. The combination of both judicial review and the doctrine of precedent helps to ensure the consistency of administrative law in Washington. Judicial review ensures that an administrative action is in line with the law and the doctrine of precedent ensures that future cases will be treated consistently with those in the past. This allows administrative agencies to focus on making decisions that are in line with the law and that will be upheld by the courts.

Related FAQs

What is the purpose of public participation in rulemaking?
What is the purpose of administrative enforcement?
What are the differences between a state and federal regulatory agency?
What is the role of public participation in administrative law?
What is the purpose of a federal regulatory body?
What are the rules governing judicial review of administrative actions?
What is the purpose of the Federal Register?
What is the role of administrative investigations?
What are judicial orders in administrative law?
What is the purpose of administrative law?

What are judicial review and the doctrine of precedent in administrative law?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts