What types of cases are not suitable for arbitration?

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Law is a form of dispute resolution that can be used in lieu of litigation. It is widely used in Virginia and across the United States as a way to resolve conflicts without the need for a trial. While arbitration can be an effective way to settle disputes, it is not suitable for every situation. Cases that require an examination of witnesses, those in which the parties are too far apart on the desired outcome, and those that are very complex may not be suitable for arbitration. Another type of case that is not suitable for arbitration is one in which a criminal offense has been alleged. In criminal cases, the defendant is presumed innocent and has the right to a fair trial. If a criminal matter were to be resolved through arbitration, the defendant would not have the opportunity to present their case in front of a jury, so the outcome would not be fair or just. Additionally, arbitration is not suitable for cases involving public policy or legal issues. These types of matters are best handled in court where they can be decided by a judge with the assistance of legal counsel. Finally, arbitration is not suitable for cases involving civil rights or other constitutional matters. These cases involve the government and can only be evaluated in a court of law. Overall, there are several cases that are not suitable for arbitration. Arbitration can be an effective tool in resolving certain types of disputes, but it is important to take into consideration the type of case that is being considered when deciding if arbitration is the right choice.

What types of cases are not suitable for arbitration?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts