What is the difference between a direct appeal and a writ of habeas corpus?

A direct appeal is an appeal taken directly from a trial court to an appellate court. It is a legal process in which an appellate court reviews a trial court’s decision to ensure that it was fair. The process is used when a person believes that the decision made was not based on the facts or applicable law. In Indiana, a direct appeal is filed with the Indiana Court of Appeals or Supreme Court. A writ of habeas corpus is a legal remedy in which a person who is being held in prison requests that a court review their detention to determine if it was lawful. The writ of habeas corpus is often used by prisoners who believe they have been wrongfully incarcerated. In Indiana, a writ of habeas corpus is filed with the Indiana Supreme Court. The main difference between a direct appeal and a writ of habeas corpus is the purpose of the filing. A direct appeal is filed to review a trial court’s decision for errors. A writ of habeas corpus is filed to challenge the legality of a person’s imprisonment. In Indiana, a direct appeal is filed with the Court of Appeals or Supreme Court, while a writ of habeas corpus is filed with only the Supreme Court.

Related FAQs

What is the procedure for requesting an en banc hearing?
What is the appellate court's jurisdiction over a given case?
What is the process for obtaining an appellate court review of a trial court’s decision?
What is the process for obtaining a stay of execution pending appeal?
What is an amicus curiae brief?
Are parties able to appeal an appellate court’s decision to a higher court?
What is the scope of review for a state Supreme Court’s decision?
What is the appellate court’s jurisdiction over a case?
What happens if I lose my appeal?
What is a writ of certiorari and how is it used in appellate practice?

What is the difference between a direct appeal and a writ of habeas corpus?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts