What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

An oral argument is a verbal presentation in court by attorneys on either side of an appeal. The attorneys will present their arguments and attempt to persuade the judge and/or panel of judges that their particular stance on the case is merited. Oral arguments typically involve the use of legal precedent, case law, and evidence to support their argument. In contrast, a brief on appeal is a written document that provides the basis for an attorney’s argument. In North Carolina, an appellant must submit their brief as part of the appellate process. The brief must provide the court with a clear explanation of the issues being raised on appeal, along with the legal arguments and case law used to support those arguments. The primary difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal is that the former is a verbal presentation of the attorney’s arguments, while the latter is a written document. An oral argument allows the attorney an opportunity to present their case in court and make their case to the judge in person. On the other hand, a brief on appeal is a written document that provides the court with a detailed overview of the issues and legal arguments on appeal.

Related FAQs

What happens if I lose my appeal?
What is the procedure for requesting an en banc hearing?
What is the process for filing a motion for reconsideration of an appellate court’s decision?
What is an amicus curiae brief?
How do I cite to appellate court decisions?
What is the appellate court’s scope of review for a jury’s factual findings?
What is the purpose of an appellate brief?
What is the standard of review on a motion for summary judgment?
Can a party appeal a judge’s decision directly to the state's Supreme Court?
What is the purpose of oral arguments to an appellate court?

What is the difference between an oral argument and a brief on appeal?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts