How often do the appellate courts review their decisions?

The South Carolina appellate courts review their decisions in a few different ways. Depending on the type of case, appeals can be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, or the court may decide to review a decision en banc. For case-by-case reviews, the appellant (the person bringing the appeal) can request an en banc review if the opinion has been issued and the court believes the case is important. An en banc review is a review of the entire decision by the entire court, not just a panel of three judges. This type of review is not done often, as most appeals are heard and decided by panels of three judges. The appellate court may also decide to rehear a case or review a prior ruling of its own. This is known as a discretionary review, and it is used to make sure that the court is taking all the facts into consideration in order to render a fair decision. A discretionary review can also be used to clarify any confusion or errors that may have been made in the prior ruling. Finally, the appellate court can choose to review a decision after it has been appealed to the South Carolina Supreme Court. This is known as a petition for certiorari, and it is used to review rulings from the lower appellate court. The South Carolina Supreme Court has the power to review a decision from the lower appellate court if it believes the decision was in error. In South Carolina, appellate court decisions are regularly reviewed in order to make sure the court is making fair rulings that are supported by the facts. A discretionary review, an en banc review, or a petition for certiorari can all be requested to ensure that rulings are accurate and just.

How often do the appellate courts review their decisions?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts