What is the difference between an asbestos trust fund and a lawsuit?

An asbestos trust fund and a lawsuit are two different methods an individual can undertake in order to receive compensation for an asbestos-related illness. Both methods are designed to help those who have been adversely affected by asbestos, however, they differ in the way in which they provide compensation. An asbestos trust fund is an administrative body established by companies that manufactured and sold asbestos-containing products. They are responsible for allocating funds to victims, who are entitled to receive compensation. Individuals can apply to the trust fund and, if approved, may receive a lump sum payment, or a smaller portion on an ongoing basis if the individual cannot prove that their sickness or injury was caused directly by asbestos. By contrast, a lawsuit is a legal action filed against a company that manufactured and sold asbestos-containing products. The individual is seeking compensation for medical bills and other related expenses due to an asbestos-related illness or injury. In order to receive compensation through a lawsuit, the individual must be able to prove that their illness or injury was caused by the company’s negligence. It is important to note that, unlike trust funds, lawsuits can provide much higher payouts and may also have other legal implications, such as punitive damages. In summary, although asbestos trust funds and lawsuits are both methods for receiving compensation for an asbestos-related illness, they differ in many ways. Trust funds provide a lump sum or smaller payments on an ongoing basis, while lawsuits require individuals to prove their illness or injury was caused by negligence. Additionally, trust funds typically provide smaller payouts, while lawsuits may provide much higher payouts, as well as additional legal implications.

What is the difference between an asbestos trust fund and a lawsuit?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts