Are bicycle accident cases usually settled or litigated?

Bicycle accident cases in Pennsylvania can be either settled or litigated. Different factors can influence which route is taken. For example, if the accident was due to negligence on the part of another, the injured cyclist may seek to recover damages in court. If both parties want to avoid the cost and time associated with a trial, they may agree to a settlement and not go to court. In most cases, settlements are more common than litigation. Settlements allow both parties to come to an agreement without the need to go through a lengthy trial. Plus, they may save both parties money in the long run since they avoid court and legal costs. The injured cyclist can potentially get the money needed to cover their medical bills and other damages from the insurance company involved. The settlement process can be tricky, as it requires both parties to agree on the amount that is acceptable to each of them. If the other party does not agree to the terms or does not offer enough money, then the injured cyclist may have to file a lawsuit. Litigation can take much longer and involves a more complex court process, which is why settlements are generally preferred.

Related FAQs

What type of compensation can I receive for lost wages after a bicycle accident?
What damages can I seek for a bicycle accident injury?
How can I prove my bicycle accident case if there were no witnesses?
Who is liable if I am injured while riding a bicycle in a bike lane?
What evidence should I collect to support my bicycle accident claim?
What if a bicycle rider collides with a pedestrian?
What if I am not sure who is responsible for my bicycle accident?
Is there a time limit to report a bicycle accident injury to my insurance company?
What if the driver in a bicycle accident appears to be uninsured or underinsured?
What if I am injured from a defective bicycle or bicycle part?

Are bicycle accident cases usually settled or litigated?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts