How does evidence obtained through discovery become admissible in a business litigation case?

In a business litigation case, evidence obtained through discovery can become admissible if it meets certain legal criteria. Essentially, the evidence must be relevant and non-prejudicial to the case. Relevant evidence is defined as something that can help prove a fact that is material to the case, while non-prejudicial evidence is evidence that does not unfairly prejudice the case. The California Evidence Code states that all evidence must be relevant to the case, and must not be so prejudicial to the opposing party that it would affect their chances of winning the case. This means that evidence that has been obtained through discovery should prove or disprove facts that are relevant to the case, and not be something that is solely used to influence the jury’s opinion. When the evidence obtained through discovery is reviewed by the court, the court will rule on whether or not the evidence is admissible. The court will consider the relevance of the evidence, the source of the information, and the potential of any prejudice the evidence may have. If the court finds the evidence to be relevant and non-prejudicial, then it will be considered admissible. In conclusion, evidence obtained through discovery in a business litigation case becomes admissible when it meets certain criteria, such as relevance and non-prejudice. The court will decide if the evidence is admissible, and if it is, the evidence can be used in court.

Related FAQs

How does evidence obtained through discovery become admissible in a business litigation case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts