What are the defenses to a boating accident claim?

In Virginia, there are several defenses available to a boating accident claim. The most common defenses are contributory negligence and assumption of risk. Contributory negligence means that the claimant, or person bringing the claim, was partially responsible for the accident. The defense of assumption of risk is when the claimant was aware of the danger and voluntarily assumed the risk. For example, if you were injured while boating and you were not wearing a life jacket, the defendant may be able to successfully argue that you assumed the risk of injury and that the defendant is not liable. However, if you were wearing a life jacket, this defense might not be as effective. Virginia also allows for the defense of comparative negligence. This means that the defendant can argue that the claimant is partially liable for their own injuries because of their own negligence or misconduct. If the court finds that the claimant was partially at fault for the accident, it could reduce the amount of damages the defendant must pay. Other defenses that may be used in a Virginia boating accident case include the defense of government immunity, where the government is not liable for any fault; lack of proximate cause, where the court finds that no direct link exists between the defendant’s conduct and the claimant’s injuries; and lastly, the statute of limitations, which could bar a claim that is filed too late. Defenses are an important part of a boating accident claim in Virginia. Being aware of the potential defenses available to a defendant can help a claimant protect their rights and ensure that justice is served.

What are the defenses to a boating accident claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts