What is the difference between a jury award and an out-of-court settlement in a brain injury case?

The difference between a jury award and an out-of-court settlement in a brain injury case in New York depends upon a few factors. A jury award occurs when a jury hears the facts of the case and decides on an appropriate amount of compensation to be paid to the injured person. The jury’s decision is legally binding and the award is usually paid by the party found at fault. This can be a lengthy process and the defendant may appeal the jury’s decision. Alternatively, an out-of-court settlement is when both parties agree upon an appropriate amount of compensation to be paid to the injured party without the need to go to trial. In a brain injury case, a settlement is usually the preferred option and is typically faster to settle than a jury award. The defendant has the option to agree to a settlement in order to avoid the costs and uncertainty of a trial and avoid a more severe jury decision. In either case, the injured party has the right to be compensated for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. An experienced brain injury lawyer can help ensure that you receive the amount of compensation that is fair and just for your injury.

Related FAQs

Are there any specific considerations for filing a brain injury lawsuit against a government agency?
What is a closed head injury?
What is mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI)?
What are some of the obstacles faced in a brain injury case?
What is the difference between a traumatic and an acquired brain injury?
What are the short-term effects of a traumatic brain injury (TBI)?
Are punitive damages available in brain injury cases?
What is the statute of limitations for a brain injury lawsuit?
What kinds of evidence are needed to prove a brain injury case?
How can a person with a brain injury get the necessary medical care?

What is the difference between a jury award and an out-of-court settlement in a brain injury case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts