Does the plaintiff in a catastrophic injury case need to prove gross negligence?

In a catastrophic injury case in New York, the plaintiff usually needs to prove that the defendant was grossly negligent. Gross negligence is defined as more than just ordinary negligence. It is a failure to take even the slightest care in performing an action, or to act in such a way that a reasonable person would not. In a catastrophic injury case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant acted in such a way that a reasonable person would not. This means that the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted in a reckless or careless manner. In addition, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s action was the cause of the injury. It is important to note that not all catastrophic injury cases require proof of gross negligence. Some cases only require the plaintiff to prove ordinary negligence. In other cases, the plaintiff may need to prove gross negligence in order to recover the maximum damages awarded in the case. In New York, the standard for proving gross negligence is higher than for proving ordinary negligence. As such, it is important to consult with an experienced catastrophic injury attorney to determine the best course of action for a particular case. An experienced attorney will be able to assess the facts of the case and determine whether a higher standard of proof is required.

Related FAQs

Does the plaintiff in a catastrophic injury case need to prove gross negligence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts