What is the difference between equitable relief and legal relief?

Equitable relief and legal relief are two different types of relief available under Michigan civil law. Equitable relief is a form of relief that a court may provide in order to provide a fair and just outcome for a dispute. This could include ordering a party to perform a certain act, such as restoring a property to a previous condition, or to refrain from doing something, such as preventing a party from engaging in particular behavior. The court may also order equitable relief in order to remedy particular wrongs, such as ordering a party to compensate for losses suffered due to breach of contract. Legal relief, on the other hand, is a form of relief ordered by a court in order to enforce a right or remedy a wrong. This could include ordering a party to pay money damages or ordering a party to return specific property. Legal relief also includes injunctions, which are orders that require a party to either take or avoid a certain action. In summary, the main difference between equitable relief and legal relief is that equitable relief is intended to provide a fair outcome, while legal relief is intended to enforce a right or remedy a wrong.

Related FAQs

What is a stipulation in civil law?
What is the difference between an injunction and an order in civil law?
What is a lis pendens in civil law?
What is the burden of persuasion in civil law?
What is a public nuisance in civil law?
How does a court decide a civil lawsuit?
What is a counterclaim in civil law?
What is a subpoena in civil law?
What is a motion for summary judgment in civil law?
What is the doctrine of res judicata in civil law?

What is the difference between equitable relief and legal relief?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts