What is the doctrine of judicial estoppel in civil litigation?

The doctrine of judicial estoppel is a legal principle applied in civil litigation cases in Hawaii that prevents a party from asserting a position in a subsequent legal proceeding that is contrary to a position previously taken in a prior proceeding. It is essentially meant to prevent an individual or party from taking advantage of the court to gain an unfair benefit or advantage. For example, a party may claim in one case that they do not own a certain property but then later claim they do own it in another case. This type of behavior is seen as both dishonest and deceptive. When this happens, the doctrine of judicial estoppel allows the court to prevent that party from changing their position. The court may do this by dismissing the case entirely or ruling in favor of the other party. The doctrine of judicial estoppel is an important tool for courts in Hawaii to prevent parties from being dishonest and deceptive in civil litigation cases. It provides a level of protection to those who are genuinely affected by the legal proceedings and ensures that justice is served.

Related FAQs

What is a default judgment in civil litigation?
What are the risks associated with civil litigation?
What is a motion for sanctions in civil litigation?
What is discovery in civil litigation?
What are the types of civil litigation cases?
What is a declaratory judgment in civil litigation?
What are the rules for experts in civil litigation?
What is the difference between trial and appellate court in civil litigation?
What are the differences between state and federal civil litigation?
What is a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction in civil litigation?

What is the doctrine of judicial estoppel in civil litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts