What are the differences between a motion for summary judgment and a motion for judgment on the pleadings in civil litigation?

In Kansas, motions for summary judgment and motions for judgment on the pleadings are two different kinds of motion used in civil litigation. A motion for summary judgment is a motion used to ask the court to decide a case based on the facts presented in the court documents, rather than proceed to a trial. The motion is typically used when the undisputed facts of the case lead to a legal conclusion that one party should win the case. On the other hand, a motion for judgment on the pleadings is a motion used to ask the court to make a decision based solely on the facts and claims presented in the pleadings of the parties. In other words, the motion is used when the facts presented by the parties are not in dispute, but the legal arguments of the parties can lead to different results. In summary, motions for summary judgment and motions for judgment on the pleadings are two different types of motions used in civil litigation in Kansas. A motion for summary judgment is used to ask the court to make a decision based on the facts presented in the court documents, while a motion for judgment on the pleadings is used to ask the court to make a decision based on the facts and claims presented in the pleadings of the parties.

Related FAQs

What are the differences between a motion for summary judgment and a motion for judgment on the pleadings in civil litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts