What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

A direct concurrent sentence in Delaware is a legal punishment in which two separate sentences are imposed simultaneously, with both sentences running at the same time. In other words, an offender can serve both sentences, one after the other. An indirect concurrent sentence, on the other hand, is a sentence in which one sentence is imposed before the other. This means that an offender will serve one sentence before beginning to serve the other. In Delaware, direct concurrent sentences are often imposed when the offense is serious enough that more than one sentence is appropriate, but the sentences are not overly long. An indirect concurrent sentence, however, is most often imposed when sentences are longer. The exact length of the sentences being served will depend on the nature of the offense. The main difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence is when the sentences begin. With a direct concurrent sentence, both sentences will begin at the same time. With an indirect concurrent sentence, one sentence will begin before the other. It is important to note that, regardless of whether a direct or indirect concurrent sentence is imposed, the total amount of time served will remain the same.

Related FAQs

What are the rules on evidence-gathering in criminal cases?
What is the difference between criminal and civil procedure?
What are the elements of a criminal case?
What is the role of the United States Supreme Court in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of a motion to dismiss in criminal cases?
What is the process of plea-bargaining in criminal cases?
What are the rights of victims in criminal proceedings?
What is the purpose of a criminal trial?
What is sentencing in criminal cases?
What are the rules of the Fourth Amendment in criminal cases?

What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts