What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

In Mississippi, a direct concurrent sentence is when two or more criminal charges are tried at the same time and a single sentence is given for all of the charges. This means that a criminal must serve the full sentence, regardless of any of the individual charges being overturned on appeal. An indirect concurrent sentence is when two or more criminal charges are tried separately but the sentences are served at the same time. In this case, if any of the charges is overturned on appeal then the defendant is only required to serve the sentence assigned to the charge that holds up in court. In other words, a direct concurrent sentence means that all of the criminal charges are tried at once and the sentences are served simultaneously, while an indirect concurrent sentence means that the criminal charges are tried separately and the sentences are served simultaneously.

Related FAQs

What is the process of police investigations in criminal cases?
What is the role of the police in criminal investigations?
What is probable cause in criminal procedure?
What is the process of a trial by jury in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of the Miranda warnings in criminal cases?
What is the impact of the Fourth Amendment on criminal law?
What is the purpose of a criminal complaint?
What is the role of the judge during a criminal trial?
What is the process of a criminal trial?
What is the purpose of a criminal trial?

Related Blog Posts

An Overview of Constitutional Protections in Criminal Procedure - July 31, 2023
The Requirements and Benefits of Proper Criminal Procedure - August 7, 2023
Understanding the Right to Remain Silent in Criminal Procedure - August 14, 2023
What You Should Know About the Exclusionary Rule in Criminal Procedure - August 21, 2023
A Look at the Role of Probable Cause in Criminal Procedure - August 28, 2023