What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

In Mississippi, a direct concurrent sentence is when two or more criminal charges are tried at the same time and a single sentence is given for all of the charges. This means that a criminal must serve the full sentence, regardless of any of the individual charges being overturned on appeal. An indirect concurrent sentence is when two or more criminal charges are tried separately but the sentences are served at the same time. In this case, if any of the charges is overturned on appeal then the defendant is only required to serve the sentence assigned to the charge that holds up in court. In other words, a direct concurrent sentence means that all of the criminal charges are tried at once and the sentences are served simultaneously, while an indirect concurrent sentence means that the criminal charges are tried separately and the sentences are served simultaneously.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a prosecution and a defense attorney?
What are the rules for hearsay evidence in criminal trials?
What is the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor?
What are the rules of evidence to be presented in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of a grand jury indictment?
What is the difference between a summary offense and an indictable offense?
What is the impact of the Fourth Amendment on criminal law?
What is the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony?
What are the different types of criminal punishments?
What is the difference between criminal and civil procedure?

Related Blog Posts

An Overview of Constitutional Protections in Criminal Procedure - July 31, 2023
The Requirements and Benefits of Proper Criminal Procedure - August 7, 2023
Understanding the Right to Remain Silent in Criminal Procedure - August 14, 2023
What You Should Know About the Exclusionary Rule in Criminal Procedure - August 21, 2023
A Look at the Role of Probable Cause in Criminal Procedure - August 28, 2023