What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

In Texas, criminal proceedings involve both direct and indirect concurrent sentences. A direct concurrent sentence is a sentence a judge issues that runs simultaneously with a prior sentence. For example, a defendant may serve sentences simultaneously for two different crimes. An indirect concurrent sentence is a sentence a judge issues that begins only after the defendant has completed the prior sentence. In other words, the defendant serves both sentences consecutively rather than concurrently. For example, if a defendant is serving a sentence for one crime and is convicted of another crime while they are still serving their sentence, the defendant may receive an indirect concurrent sentence. This means they must serve the sentence for the prior crime before they can begin serving the sentence for the second crime. If an indirect concurrent sentence is given, the sentences for both crimes must be served completely before the defendant is released. In summary, a direct concurrent sentence is a sentence that a judge issues to run simultaneously with a prior sentence, while an indirect concurrent sentence requires the defendant to complete their prior sentence before they can begin serving a new sentence.

Related FAQs

What is the purpose of a criminal grand jury?
What are the rights of a suspect during a criminal investigation?
What is the difference between a summary offense and an indictable offense?
What are the constitutional rights of suspects in criminal cases?
What is the authority of a police officer in criminal cases?
What is the purpose of a pre-trial hearing?
What is the process of plea-bargaining in criminal cases?
What are the different types of criminal defenses?
What is criminal procedure?
What is the purpose of a criminal jury?

What is the difference between a direct and an indirect concurrent sentence?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts