How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

An attorney defending a criminal case in Washington can challenge evidence in a number of ways. First, they can file a motion to suppress evidence, which aims to keep illegally obtained evidence from being presented in court. For example, if the police had illegally searched a suspect’s home, any evidence they found there could be excluded from the trial. Second, the attorney can challenge the credibility and reliability of the evidence. They can point out any inconsistencies in the evidence or uncover any factual or legal errors that could cast doubt on its accuracy. Third, the attorney can also challenge the admissibility of evidence. This means they can argue that certain evidence should not be presented in court because it is too prejudicial or too unreliable. For instance, a witness’s statement about a crime may be inadmissible if it is considered too prejudicial or if they cannot prove the witness is reliable. Finally, the attorney can also challenge the chain of custody of the evidence. They can argue that the evidence was mishandled or that it was not properly stored or documented. If this is true, then the evidence may not be admissible in court. These are just some of the ways an attorney can challenge evidence in a criminal defense case in Washington. It is important for attorneys to thoroughly evaluate all the evidence and to challenge any parts of it that may be unreliable.

Related FAQs

How can an attorney challenge evidence in a criminal defense case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts