How do criminal defense attorneys present closing arguments in court?

Criminal defense attorneys in California present closing arguments to the court to remind the jury of the facts of the case that support their argument. The attorney will sum up the facts, point out any flaws in the prosecution’s evidence, and explain how the evidence is relevant to a not-guilty verdict. The attorney may also explain why certain evidence is not relevant and why any contradictory evidence should be dismissed. The defense attorney’s closing argument should be based on the facts of the case and the applicable law. The attorney may explain to the jury any reasonable doubt that is presented by the evidence. The attorney may also provide a timeline or narrative to contextualize the facts and bring out any mitigating circumstances. The attorney usually ends the closing argument with a plea to the jury to consider the evidence objectively and to consider the reasonable doubt presented, and to render a verdict of not guilty if that doubt exists in their mind. The closing argument should be concise, organized, and logical. It should also be emotionally stirring in order to persuade the jury to reach the attorney’s desired verdict.

Related FAQs

What are the consequences of a criminal conviction in criminal defense law?
What is the right to counsel in criminal defense law?
What is a plea bargain in criminal defense law?
How is evidence presented in a criminal trial?
What factors should I consider when deciding on a criminal defense lawyer?
What is the right to remain silent in criminal defense law?
What are the rules of evidence in criminal defense law?
What is the role of a judge in a criminal defense case?
What is an insanity defense in criminal defense law?
What are the rights of a criminal suspect in criminal defense law?

How do criminal defense attorneys present closing arguments in court?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts