What is the doctrine of frustration in a contract?

The doctrine of frustration in a contract is a legal concept that applies when circumstances beyond the control of the parties to a contract prevent the performance of the contract. This doctrine applies in Washington, just like in other states. It is important to note that this doctrine only applies when those circumstances were unforeseeable and unavoidable, and could not have been anticipated when the contract was entered into. When the doctrine of frustration is applied to a contract, it can have different outcomes depending on the specifics of the case. Generally, it means that the contract is considered void and the parties to the contract no longer have any obligations under it. This means that they do not have to fulfill any of the promises they made in the contract anymore. The doctrine of frustration can also be used as a defense by one of the parties to a contract who is being sued by the other party. If that party can prove that the circumstance beyond their control made it impossible for them to fulfill their obligations under the contract, then the court may find that they are not liable for breach of contract. Overall, the doctrine of frustration in a contract is an important legal concept that can be used to determine the outcome of a contract when it cannot be fulfilled due to circumstances beyond the control of the parties. It is important for people to understand when it can be applied and how the outcome of a contract can be affected by it.

Related FAQs

What is the parol evidence rule and why is it important?
What is a contract of adhesion?
What is an implied covenant of good faith?
What is the effect of illegality in a contract?
What is controverting the evidence?
What is a contract of sale?
What is the common law?
What is a condition subsequent?
What is a third-party guarantor?
What is a contract of employment?

What is the doctrine of frustration in a contract?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts