What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment?

A motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment are two different types of motions in civil procedure in California. A motion to dismiss is a first step in the civil trial process that occurs before discovery. It is a request to the court to terminate the case without any further proceedings because of a lack of sufficient legal grounds. If a court grants a motion to dismiss, the case is essentially over. A motion for summary judgment is a motion made by either the plaintiff or the defendant, asking the court to decide and rule on the case without a trial. Generally, the parties are represented and have exchanged information, and the judge will determine if a case should be decided by summary judgment. It is used to determine if either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law and can only be granted if there is no material dispute of fact. In summary, a motion to dismiss is a request for the court to terminate the case before discovery, whereas a motion for summary judgment is used to decide the case without a trial after discovery has taken place.

Related FAQs

What is a motion for a new trial?
What is a settlement conference?
What is a motion for summary judgment?
How does a plaintiff prove their case in a civil action?
What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?
What are the remedies for discovery violations?
How does civil procedure differ from state to state?
What is the statute of limitations for civil actions?
What is the trial stage of civil procedure?
What is the judgment/verdict stage of civil procedure?

What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts