What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

In the civil legal process, a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment are two different proceedings that can potentially resolve disputes. In Virginia, a settlement conference is the culmination of two or more parties attempting to reach an agreement without going to trial. It is voluntary and non-binding. At a settlement conference, parties present their cases to a mediator and try to work out a compromise between the two. The mediator does not decide the case, but can provide advice on the dispute. If an agreement is reached, it will need to be approved by a judge before it is final. A motion for summary judgment is a way to end a case without going to trial. It is a request made by a party to a lawsuit asking the court to issue a judgment in its favor. A party making a motion for summary judgment must demonstrate that there is no genuine dispute or issue of fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In summary, a settlement conference is a voluntary, non-binding process in which two or more parties attempt to come to an agreement while a motion for summary judgment is a request from one party asking the court to issue a judgment in its favor without going to trial.

Related FAQs

What is a remittitur?
What is a motion for summary judgment?
How long do parties have to respond to pleadings?
What is the trial stage of civil procedure?
What are the remedies for discovery violations?
What are the different types of civil actions?
What is the statute of frauds?
What are the rules for amending pleadings?
What is a deposition?
What are the steps for filing a motion for summary judgment?

What is the difference between a settlement conference and a motion for summary judgment?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts