What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?

A stipulation and an agreement are both legally binding documents that must be adhered to in civil procedure in California. Stipulations are generally more specific than agreements and can be used to settle disputes between two parties without the need for a trial. Stipulations can also include provisions for self-enforcement, meaning that if one party fails to adhere to their stipulation, the other party can force them to stick to the agreement without involving a third party. Agreements, on the other hand, are more general and less specific. They usually involve an exchange of some sort and can be used to establish or dissolve a contract; for example, people may enter into a contract to buy a home. Agreements also generally include a clause that appeals to the court if necessary for enforcement. In summary, a stipulation is a specific and legally binding document that can be used to settle disputes and self-enforce without a trial. An agreement is more general and involves an exchange of some sort. Both documents must be followed in order to be enforceable in the state of California.

Related FAQs

What is the standard of proof for a civil case?
What are the rules and procedures for a change of venue?
What is the role of a judge in a civil case?
What is the standard of review for an appellate court?
What are the challenges to a summons?
What is an answer?
What is the difference between civil and criminal procedure?
What is the purpose of a deposition?
What is the burden of proof in civil cases?
What is the statute of limitations for civil actions?

What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts