What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?

A stipulation and an agreement are both legal terms used to describe a contractual relationship between two or more parties. However, they do have some differences. A stipulation is often used in civil procedure in Idaho. It is an agreement between two or more parties in which they come to an understanding or agreement on certain facts. This stipulation is done with an affidavit or a written statement and is then seen as proof in a trial. An agreement, on the other hand, is an agreement between two or more parties that creates an obligation to do or not do certain things. An agreement is usually in the form of a contract, where the parties agree to certain conditions in exchange for something of value. Overall, the difference between a stipulation and an agreement is that a stipulation is used to prove certain facts in a trial and an agreement is used to create an obligation between two or more parties. Both are legally binding in Idaho and are important to understand in civil procedure.

Related FAQs

What is the doctrine of res judicata?
What are the court rules for a summary judgment hearing?
What are the rules for joinder of parties in a civil suit?
What is a motion for a preliminary injunction?
What is a motion in limine?
What are the different types of civil actions?
What is civil procedure?
What is a writ of attachment?
What is a change of venue?
What are the common defenses in civil law?

What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts