What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for a more definite statement?

A motion to dismiss is a request to the court to end a case without any further consideration. A motion to dismiss can be raised for many reasons, such as a lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, failure to state a claim, or other legal grounds. In order for the motion to be successful, the defendant must prove that the case has no legal basis. A motion for a more definite statement is a request to the court to require the plaintiff to provide more detail in their complaint. This type of motion is used when the complaint filed fails to provide sufficient details of the claims being made. The court will then require the plaintiff to explain each element of their claims in greater detail before a decision can be made on the merits of the case. In Hawaii, both of these motions are handled by the court and a decision is made based on the evidence provided. Like in other states, both parties must submit evidence to the court in order for the motion to be heard and a ruling to be made. Ultimately, the decision to grant either motion is left to the court and their determination of the merits of each case.

Related FAQs

What is the doctrine of collateral estoppel?
What is the difference between a motion for a new trial and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict?
What is a "slip and fall" lawsuit?
What is a change of venue?
What is an answer?
What are the common defenses in civil law?
What is alternative dispute resolution (ADR)?
What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment?
What are the applicable statutes of limitations?
What are the elements of a civil lawsuit?

What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for a more definite statement?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts