What is the difference between a motion to transfer venue and a motion to dismiss?

The difference between a motion to transfer venue and a motion to dismiss lies in the objective of the filer. A motion to transfer venue requests that the court move the case to a different court with jurisdiction over the case, due to practical or other reasons. A motion to dismiss, on the other hand, requests that the court completely dismiss the case because the claim lacks merit or exceeds the court’s jurisdiction. Both motions are typically filed in the original court. For example, in Florida civil procedure, if a plaintiff files in the wrong jurisdiction, the defendant can file a motion to transfer venue requesting that the court move the case to the correct jurisdiction. Alternatively, if a plaintiff fails to state a cause of action or the defendant has a personal legal defense against the claim, the defendant can file a motion to dismiss to have the court dismiss the case and not move it. In either motion, the court will assess the filer’s argument and rule accordingly, typically through an accompanying hearing. In the case of a motion to transfer venue, if the court grants it, the case will then be transferred and heard in the court chosen by the filer. In the case of a motion to dismiss, if the court grants it, the case ends there.

Related FAQs

What are the elements of a breach of contract claim?
What is the trial stage of civil procedure?
What are the applicable statutes of limitations?
What is the difference between a motion to transfer venue and a motion to dismiss?
What is an answer?
What is a motion to compel or enforce discovery?
What is a deposition?
What are the rules for alternative dispute resolution?
What is a motion to intervene?
What are the remedies for civil actions?

What is the difference between a motion to transfer venue and a motion to dismiss?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts