What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

The difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case is defined by the particular state’s civil procedure code. In California, a motion to intervene is a request made to the court by an individual who is not a party to a lawsuit, but is interested in the outcome of a legal proceeding. Intervenors have the right to present arguments and evidence to the court relating to the case, as well as appeal or challenge any court order. In contrast, a motion to join a case is made by parties who are either already involved in the case, or those who are impacted by the lawsuit and want to join it. Joinder allows plaintiffs or defendants to combine multiple cases into one and can be done when the cases involve a common issue or set of facts. Unlike intervenors, parties to whom the motion is made generally do not have the same ability to present evidence or appeal court orders.

Related FAQs

What is a discovery request?
What are the rules and procedures for jury selection?
What are the remedies for discovery violations?
What are the remedies for civil actions?
What are the rules and procedures for a change of venue?
What is the doctrine of res judicata?
What is the difference between mediation and arbitration?
What are the different types of civil actions?
What are the elements of a civil lawsuit?
What is the appeals process?

What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts