What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

The difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case is defined by the particular state’s civil procedure code. In California, a motion to intervene is a request made to the court by an individual who is not a party to a lawsuit, but is interested in the outcome of a legal proceeding. Intervenors have the right to present arguments and evidence to the court relating to the case, as well as appeal or challenge any court order. In contrast, a motion to join a case is made by parties who are either already involved in the case, or those who are impacted by the lawsuit and want to join it. Joinder allows plaintiffs or defendants to combine multiple cases into one and can be done when the cases involve a common issue or set of facts. Unlike intervenors, parties to whom the motion is made generally do not have the same ability to present evidence or appeal court orders.

Related FAQs

What is class action litigation?
What is civil procedure?
What is the difference between a motion to transfer venue and a motion to dismiss?
What is a motion for summary judgment?
What is a motion for default judgment?
How do juries determine liability?
What is the difference between a motion to dismiss and a motion for a more definite statement?
What is a motion for a preliminary injunction?
What is a motion for an order of contempt?
What is the doctrine of laches?

What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts