What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

In Civil Procedure in Virginia, a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case are two distinct legal concepts. A motion to intervene is filed by a third party who has an interest in an existing case, but who has not yet been made a formal party to the case. For example, someone who is not a plaintiff or defendant may still have an interest in the outcome of the case and thus may file a motion to intervene to be heard by the court. A motion to join a case is a request for a new party to be added to an existing case. It is usually filed by one of the existing parties, such as a plaintiff or defendant, who wants to join another party or parties to the case. This may be because the additional party is suspected of being liable for the same damages or accused of the same wrongdoing as the other parties. In summary, the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case is that a motion to intervene is filed by a third party who has an interest in an existing case, but who has not yet been made a formal party to the case, whereas a motion to join a case is a request for a new party to be added to an existing case.

Related FAQs

What is a joinder?
What is a motion for injunctive relief?
What are the rules for joinder of parties in a civil suit?
What is a complaint?
What is an answer?
What is the statute of limitations for civil actions?
What is the difference between civil and criminal procedure?
What are the challenges to a summons?
What is the difference between federal and state civil procedure?
What is a motion for reconsideration?

What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts