What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

In Civil Procedure in Virginia, a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case are two distinct legal concepts. A motion to intervene is filed by a third party who has an interest in an existing case, but who has not yet been made a formal party to the case. For example, someone who is not a plaintiff or defendant may still have an interest in the outcome of the case and thus may file a motion to intervene to be heard by the court. A motion to join a case is a request for a new party to be added to an existing case. It is usually filed by one of the existing parties, such as a plaintiff or defendant, who wants to join another party or parties to the case. This may be because the additional party is suspected of being liable for the same damages or accused of the same wrongdoing as the other parties. In summary, the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case is that a motion to intervene is filed by a third party who has an interest in an existing case, but who has not yet been made a formal party to the case, whereas a motion to join a case is a request for a new party to be added to an existing case.

Related FAQs

What is a motion for judgment on the pleadings?
What is the difference between a stipulation and an agreement?
What are the rules for joinder of parties in a civil suit?
What are the common defenses in civil law?
What is a motion for default judgment?
What is the judgment/verdict stage of civil procedure?
What is a motion for reconsideration?
What is the difference between federal and state civil procedure?
What is the pre-trial stage of civil procedure?
How can a party be added or removed from a lawsuit?

What is the difference between a motion to intervene and a motion to join a case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts