What is an assumption of risk defense?

An assumption of risk defense is a legal principle utilized in product liability cases which can be used to defend a product manufacturer or other responsible parties from liability. In these cases, the argument is made that the injured party accepted or assumed the risk of injury when they chose to use the product in question. In the state of Maryland, this defense may be used in cases where the product was clearly dangerous and the injured party was aware of this danger, and that this knowledge was conveyed by labeling or other notice. However, in order for the assumption of risk defense to be used successfully, the situation must meet certain criteria. The injured party must have been aware of the risk, and they must have voluntarily accepted that risk by using the product. In addition, the injured party must have been able to make an informed decision about whether or not to use the product. Finally, the risk must have been within the scope of what was assumed. If the assumptions of risk defense is proven, then the manufacturer or other responsible party can be held not liable for the injury.

Related FAQs

What is a “failure to inspect” defense to a product liability claim?
What is the effect of a waiver or release on a product liability claim?
What types of products have a higher risk of causing injury?
What is a “strict application of the law” defense to a product liability claim?
What is “strict liability”?
What are the types of defenses that may be raised by the defendant in a products liability claim?
What is a product liability warning label?
What is a breach of warranty defense?
What is an “implied warranty” defense to a product liability claim?
Who can I hold liable if I am injured by a defective product?

What is an assumption of risk defense?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts