What is a “lack of causation” defense to a product liability claim?

In Oklahoma, a “lack of causation” defense is a legal defense that can be used by a manufacturer of a product in a product liability claim. Essentially, this defense states that despite the fact that the product may be considered defective or dangerous, the product is not the actual cause of the injury. For example, if a product is meant to be used in a certain way, but the user operates it incorrectly, the manufacturer may argue that they should not be liable for any damages caused by the product because the user’s negligence was the cause of the injury. The manufacturer may also argue that the product was damaged prior to use and that the damage caused the injury. In this case, the manufacturer may argue that the product was not sold in a defective or dangerous condition, and so the product should not be held liable for damages. In order for a manufacturer to successfully use the “lack of causation” defense, they must prove that the product did not cause the injury and that the user’s negligence or a pre-existing condition of the product caused the injury. If the manufacturer cannot prove this, they may be liable for damages caused by the product.

Related FAQs

What is the difference between a manufacturer’s defect and a design defect?
What duty of care do manufacturers have to consumers?
What is the burden of proof in a product liability case?
What is the Risk Homeostasis Theory?
What are the rules and regulations governing product liability in the United States?
What is a product liability insurance policy?
What is a “fraudulent misrepresentation” defense to a product liability claim?
What is Dangerous Products Law?
What is a comparative negligence defense?
How can I tell if a product is defective?

What is a “lack of causation” defense to a product liability claim?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts