Is a person required to demonstrate actual harm in order to sue for defamation?

Yes, a person must demonstrate actual harm in order to sue for defamation in Minnesota. Defamation is the act of making a false statement that damages a person’s reputation. Minnesota law states that a plaintiff must show that they have suffered an actual harm in order to succeed in a defamation lawsuit. Actual harm has been traditionally interpreted as economic damages, such as lost wages or lost business as a result of the defamation. However, Minnesota courts have recently held that actual harm can also include non-economic damages, such as mental anguish and emotional distress. In addition to demonstrating actual harm, the plaintiff must also prove the elements of libel or slander. In Minnesota, if a statement is made about a private figure, the plaintiff must prove that the statement was made with “actual malice”--that is, the speaker intended to harm the plaintiff’s reputation and the statement was made without considering the truth of the statement. If the statement is about a public figure, the plaintiff must prove that the statement was made with a “reckless disregard for the truth.” In sum, a plaintiff in Minnesota must demonstrate actual harm and prove either actual malice or a reckless disregard for the truth in order to sue for defamation. This protects individuals from being wrongfully accused of making false or damaging statements and gives the plaintiff the opportunity to be compensated for the damage done to their reputation.

Related FAQs

Is an Internet service provider held liable for defamatory content published on its network?
Are there any restrictions on the type of evidence that can be used in a defamation case?
What is the difference between libel and slander in terms of elements?
How do defamation laws vary from state to state?
Is a person allowed to use parody as a defense in a defamation lawsuit?
What kind of proof is required to win a defamation lawsuit?
Are websites protected from liability for content published by its users?
Is an employer held liable for defamatory statements made by an employee?
Is truth a defense to a defamation claim?
What are the elements of a defamation claim?

Is a person required to demonstrate actual harm in order to sue for defamation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts