What is the difference between a libel and slander case?

Libel and slander are both forms of defamation law in California that involve individuals or businesses making false statements about another person or entity. The main difference between libel and slander is the medium in which the statement is made. Libel applies to false statements that are written or published, including in printed materials, electronic media, or pictures. Slander applies to false spoken statements. In California, libel is generally easier to prove than slander. Making a false statement that is published or in a permanent form can be proven by evidence, making it easier to prove damages. Slander is more difficult to prove because it requires that the plaintiff show that the false statement was intentional and malicious. This can be difficult since slander is generally unspoken and without a written record. The punishments for libel and slander are different as well. Defamation cases in California can result in payment of damages, an injunction that prohibits the offender from repeating the statement, or both. With libel cases, the plaintiff can more easily be compensated for any financial losses resulting from the false statement. In slander cases, the plaintiff is more likely to receive an injunction rather than financial compensation.

Related FAQs

Is a person allowed to use parody as a defense in a defamation lawsuit?
Are statements made in an advertisement considered defamatory?
Can a person be liable for repeating a defamatory statement?
Can a statement made on a website be considered defamatory?
Is a person allowed to use the defense of good faith in a defamation lawsuit?
What is defamation law?
Are threats considered defamation?
Are statements made in the media protected by defamation law?
What is the difference between defamation per se and defamation per quod?
Are websites protected from liability for content published by its users?

What is the difference between a libel and slander case?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts