What is the difference between a restraining order and a PFA order?

A restraining order and a PFA order are both forms of legal protection from domestic abuse in Washington. A restraining order is a legal document issued by a court that orders one person (the restrained person) to stay away from another person. The order can also forbid the restrained person from contacting the other person, or from coming near their home, school, or workplace. A PFA order, or Protection from Abuse (PFA) order, is also a legal document issued by a court in Washington. While restraining orders prohibit a person from taking certain actions, a PFA order goes further. A PFA order can prohibit a person from committing domestic abuse, entering the home of another person, or making contact with another person. Additionally, it can provide specific guidance, such as granting custody of children or determining temporary financial support. In short, the main difference between a restraining order and a PFA order is the additional protections a PFA order can provide. While a restraining order prohibits certain contact, a PFA order can provide additional protection from domestic abuse, including child custody and financial support.

Related FAQs

What should a victim of domestic abuse do to protect their rights in court?
What is the statute of limitations for filing a domestic abuse case?
What is the definition of domestic violence?
What is the role of child protective services in cases of domestic abuse?
Are there any government services available for victims of domestic abuse?
What is the difference between a temporary and a permanent restraining order?
What are the long-term effects of domestic abuse on a victim?
What are the types of domestic abuse?
Are there any local resources for victims of domestic abuse?
What are the limitations of a restraining order?

What is the difference between a restraining order and a PFA order?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts