What are the criteria for determining who should serve as guardian?

In Washington, the criteria for determining who should serve as guardian is generally based on the best interests of the child. The court usually assesses the mental, emotional and physical health of the child along with his or her age, gender and family relationships. The court also considers the availability and willingness of a person to serve as a guardian. If the potential guardian is close to the child such as a relative, is willing to serve and can demonstrate that they can financially provide care and emotional support, they may be more likely to be appointed. In addition, the court considers the potential guardian’s ability to provide education, medical and other necessary care, as well as their experience in providing such care. The court also looks at the guardian’s mental and physical health. The court must also consider the wishes of the child. If the child is mature enough to make a decision, the court will weigh the child’s opinion when making its decision. The court will also consider the wishes of any siblings and the parents, if deemed relevant. When deciding who should serve as guardian, the court is tasked with ensuring the best possible care and protection of the child.

Related FAQs

Can an individual object to a guardianship?
What is the purpose of guardianship?
How does a guardianship end?
What is a power of attorney?
What is involved in establishing a guardianship?
What are the rights of the guardian?
Can a minor consent to a guardianship?
What happens if a guardian is no longer able to fulfill their duties?
How does a guardian make decisions on behalf of a ward?
How do you select a guardian?

What are the criteria for determining who should serve as guardian?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts