What are the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration over litigation?

Arbitration and litigation are two ways of settling disputes between parties. Litigation involves a case being heard in a court of law, while arbitration involves the two parties agreeing to appoint a neutral third person to decide the outcome of their dispute. One advantage of arbitration over litigation is that it can be quicker. It can often take years to get a court case heard, but arbitration proceedings can take significantly less time. This means that the parties involved can resolve their dispute much quicker than if they were to go through the more traditional court process. Arbitration is also significantly less expensive than litigation. Rather than paying a lawyer to represent each side and the court costs, the parties involve simply need to pay the arbitrator for their services. This could be especially beneficial for individuals or businesses who do not have the funds to pay for a lengthy court case. However, there are also some disadvantages to arbitration. One downside is that the arbitrator’s decision is usually final and cannot be appealed. This means that if one party disagrees with the outcome of the arbitration, they have no other legal options available to them. Finally, arbitration proceedings are not as transparent as litigation. Since there is no legal record of the proceedings, the outcome may not be seen as being completely fair by the parties involved. In summary, the advantages of arbitration over litigation are that it is quicker, cheaper and less adversarial. However, its disadvantages include the lack of legal process, the finality of the decision and the lack of transparency.

Related FAQs

What are the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration over litigation?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts