What is the difference between a judgment in rem and a judgment in personam?

A judgment in rem is a judgment that is enforceable against a specific thing, and it is binding on all persons regardless of the location. In Alaska, a judgment in rem is a court order that deals with the rights of a person over a particular item of property, such as a house or a car. The judgment is registered in the county court and marks a lien against the property. This means that if the owner attempts to sell the property, the purchaser will be notified of the outstanding lien and must pay it off before they can take ownership. On the other hand, a judgment in personam is a judgment that applies only to a particular person or entity and is enforceable only within the jurisdiction in which it was granted. In Alaska, a judgment in personam can be enforced against a person, company, or other entity that is located in the jurisdiction. It can be enforced by suspending the person’s or company’s license or attaching liens to their property or assets. Judgment in personam can also involve garnishing wages or seizing other types of assets.

Related FAQs

What is a standing order and when can it be used in international litigation?
What types of documents can be used as evidence in an international court?
What is a class action in international litigation?
What are the differences between judicial and non-judicial remedies in international litigation?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration in international disputes?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of international arbitration?
What is a permanent injunction and when can it be used in international litigation?
What is the concept of estoppel in international litigation?
What factors should be considered when selecting a forum for resolving an international dispute?
What is the purpose of a motion for reconsideration in an international court?

What is the difference between a judgment in rem and a judgment in personam?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts