What is the difference between a judgment in rem and a judgment in personam?

A judgment in rem is a judgment against a thing or property. It is binding upon the world and is enforceable against all who have an interest in the property, regardless of whether or not they were parties to the litigation. For example, when a court issues a judgment in rem, the debtor’s property can be seized and used to pay the debt. A judgment in personam is a judgment against a person. It is only binding against the individuals or entities who were parties to the litigation. It does not affect the interest of non-parties in the property and does not give the judgment creditor the right to seize the property. For example, when a court issues a judgment in personam, the debtor is bound to pay the debt, but the creditor cannot enforce the debt against any third parties who have an interest in the property.

Related FAQs

What are the limitations to filing a claim in an international court?
What is the concept of estoppel in international litigation?
What authority do international legal counselors have?
What is the role of the International Court of Justice in international litigation?
How can a party enforce a forum selection clause in international litigation?
What is ex parte provisional relief in international litigation?
What are the differences between permanent and temporary injunctions in international litigation?
What are the differences between local court proceedings and international proceedings?
What are the rules governing conflicts of laws in international litigation?
What is a motion to compel and when can it be used in international litigation?

What is the difference between a judgment in rem and a judgment in personam?

Related FAQs

Related Blog Posts